The food insecurity-obesity paradox: what it is and why it matters

2007 Impact statement
  • Olson, Christine Marie

abstract

Greater understanding of the food insecurity-obesity paradox has led to more sensible approaches to addressing obesity in the general population.

submitted by

issue being addressed

The coexistence of food insecurity and obesity within the same individuals and populations is viewed by many as impossible. Their documented coexistence has led to questions about the validity of the concept and measurement of food insecurity and called for cut-backs in food assistance program benefits for poor families.

response

Research was undertaken to understand the mechanisms by which the two concepts of food insecurity/hunger and obesity are related. Results indicate that women who experienced food insecurity as children are more likely to be overweight as adults. Across time obese women are more likely to become food insecure than non-obese women. Papers reporting these findings were published in 2007 and early 2008.

impact assessment

The tenor of discussions on the issue has changed and suggestions to cut food assistance program benefits to prevent obesity are no longer viewed as sensible. The discussions and program suggestions are turning toward ensuring that today`s children do not experience hunger in early life and improving the quality of diets of poor families, including increasing fruit and vegetable availability, accessibility, and consumption. More holistic and environmentally-based approaches to addressing obesity in the population as a whole are being considered.

academic priority area

has geographic focus

more links 19 more

funding source description

  • Multistate
  • Special Grants
  • National Research Initiative

collaborators

Bassett Healthcare

key personnel

  • Judy Seoldo
  • Josephine Swanson
  • Myla Strawderman
  • Linda Robbins

mission focus

From CALS annual faculty reporting. Imported on August 5, 2008